Hey, hey, that would be new ! (although I heard something similar from Edwin Goel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]))
Can someone confirm this somewhere ?? Which version of JAXP is this ?? Paul On Mercredi, mars 20, 2002, at 03:45 , Shane Curcuru wrote: > There are a number of people (although not me currently) working on > this kind of issue. > > One comment about JAXP: in my non-lawyerly way, I'm presuming there is > no issue here. The xml-commons project is how Xalan (and soon Xerces) > get their SAX/DOM/JAXP code. The actual source files for the > javax.xml.parsers and javax.xml.transform packages are checked into the > xml-commons repository with the Apache license - so I don't see why you > can't use this implementation just like any other Apache software. I > guess I'm not seeing why most people can't just ignore the licensing > issues with the JAXP specification, and just happily use xml-commons' > implementation thereof and just use the Apache license. > > (Since a Sun engineer checked in the xml-commons/.../javax files and > has confirmed that they should have the Apache license, I'm pretty sure > it was not a mistake). > > And my other non-lawyerly comments are that SAX is a no brainer, and > the DOM license seems pretty permissive as long as you're just using it > as-is. > > ===== > - Shane > > <eof aka="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; > .sig="Du sublime au ridicule il n'y a qu'un pas." /> > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage > http://sports.yahoo.com/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
