Oh,
How nice. From the "Java API for XML Processing RI 1.2.0-FCS -- Readme", one can read: > Software Licenses > The software under the package hierarchies beginning with org.w3c.dom > is covered by the W3C Software License. All of the remaining software > in this distribution is covered by the Apache Software Foundation > License. Does this mean that the classes like javax/xml/parsers/DocumentBuilderFactory are under Apache license ? I see no quote that would contradict me but... the java xml pack Summer'02 has strongly different license to which you have to agree before downloading it, among others: > 7. Source Code. Software may contain source code that is provided > solely for reference purposes pursuant to the terms of this Agreement.� > Source code may not be redistributed unless expressly provided for in > this Agreement. Can we hope to have a coherence at some point with these JAXP licenses ? This has been hanging around since way too much time, I feel. Or is it simply a JCP internal debate left ? Thanks. Paul On Jeudi, juin 13, 2002, at 03:27 AM, Edwin Goei wrote: > Hi all, > > Since JAXP 1.2 spec has officially been approved. I've updated the JAXP > FAQ that I have been maintaining. This FAQ contains updated info on > JAXP such as the fact that the RI now uses the Xerces2 parser. It also > contains links to online browsable javadoc and JAXP RI docs. > > http://xml.apache.org/~edwingo/jaxp-faq.html > > BTW, the official version on java.sun.com still needs to be updated (it > is a heavier weight process). > > -Edwin --------------------------------------------------------------------- In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
