Re: is there such a thing as a common xml-apis.jar

[Joe Germuska]

At 9:57 AM -0800 2002/11/07, Edwin Goei wrote:

The reason for this is b/c of the endorsed standards rules for JDK 1.4 where newer versions of sax and dom are allowed, but not javax.xml.{parsers,transform}. There is more info on this at http://xml.apache.org/~edwingo/jaxp-faq.html.

At 11:34 AM -0500 2002/11/07, Elena Litani wrote:

SAX 2.0.1 had a signature change and DOM3 introduces new methods in the
existing interfaces (plus addes new interfaces to the org.w3c.dom
package), and these changes will _not_ allow implementations to pass the
JAXP TCK since the TCK tests that signatures are as definded in the spec
and that no new signatures are added to the interfaces/classes.

This looks like a serious collision waiting to happen... Maybe this is one reason why everything doesn't need to be rolled into the core of J2SE?

Joe

--
--
* Joe Germuska { [EMAIL PROTECTED] }
"It's pitiful, sometimes, if they've got it bad. Their eyes get glazed, they go white, their hands tremble.... As I watch them I often feel that a dope peddler is a gentleman compared with the man who sells records."
--Sam Goody, 1956

---------------------------------------------------------------------
In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]