I'm quite happy with it (rev 1.13). The only thing I see is the following: "Bugzilla" is avoided in favor of "bug database" whereas there's "CVS" in several places where we probably should talk about "source repository" because there's the possibility that a move to Subversion may happen in the next months/years. Just a thought. Not a blocker IMO.
On 09.06.2003 19:16:57 Ted Leung wrote: > Does anyone have any outstanding issues with this version of the > charter? Are we ready for a vote? Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
