Hi,
I have to apologize for coming up with comments after the voting has
started. I have two questions:
In Section 8.1 b) there's a reference to CVS repositories. If projects
move to another repository system such as SVN, would this require another
vote to change the charter? Maybe we could use something more general,
like just "repository".
I find Section 10.1 a little unclear. Surely, we don't expect a vote
(either before or after) on every bug fix that goes in? I would expect
discussion and votes on redesign and features, but I've always thought
that committers could work independently to address "smaller" bugs reported
in bugzilla.
Thanks,
Ilene.
Ted Leung
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
om> cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [VOTE] xml.apache.charter
06/11/2003 03:52
PM
Please respond to
pmc
Ted Leung wrote:
> Okay,
>
> It seems that the charter has settled down enough to have a vote. The
> current version is available here:
>
>
http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/xml-admin/charter.txt?rev=1.13&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup
>
> Voting will last until 6/17, and we need a unanimous vote of PMC
> members for this to pass. Here's a ballot for convenience.
>
> Scott Boag [ ]
> Andy Clark [ ]
> Shane Curcuru [ ]
> Christian Geuer-Pollmann [ ]
> Neil Graham [ ]
> Kip Hampton [ ]
> Vincent Hardy [ ]
> Berin Lautenbach [ ]
> Ted Leung [ x ]
> Jeremias Maerki [ ]
> Steven Noels [ ]
> Santiago Pericas-Geertsen [ ]
> Gareth Reakes [ ]
> Gianugo Rabellino [ ]
> Sam Ruby [ ]
> Matt Sergeant [ ]
> Ilene Seelemann [ ]
> Kimbro Staken [ ]
> Jason Stewart [ ]
> Jeff Turner [ ]
> Dirk-Willem van Gulik [ ]
> Peter B. West [ ]
> PeiYong Zhang [ ]
>
> Ted
---------------------------------------------------------------------
In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
