How's about I see if I can go through the various e-mails and capture the key points into the charter.
I also think, now that the PMC is larger than it originally was, I might just change the charter changing process to be 2/3 committers approve with no negatives. (Any objections?)
Give me a couple of days and I will check something into the CVS for all to review.
Cheers,
BerinTed Leung wrote:
Okay,
I've collated all the votes for the new charter, and here's the result. There were 14 votes in favor (15, but one was past the 17th), no veto votes, and 8 people who did not vote. There were also a number of requests for changes in wording. Since the old charter requires unanimous approval, I'd say that the vote has failed. A number of the changes in the current draft are really needed, so I'm not sure how we want to proceed. I guess we can try to accomodate the
wording changes and try again. If one of the folks who didn't vote has
a major issue with the charter, it would help to hear what that is. If people want to do something different, please speak up.
People who have requested wording changes are:
Shane Curcuru Kip Hampton Matt Sergeant Ilene Seelemann Peter B. West
Here's the collated ballot.
Scott Boag [ ] Andy Clark [ x ] Shane Curcuru [ x ] Christian Geuer-Pollmann [ x ] Neil Graham [ x ] (6/19) Kip Hampton [ ] Vincent Hardy [ ] Berin Lautenbach [ x ] Ted Leung [ x ] Jeremias Maerki [ x ] Steven Noels [ x ] Santiago Pericas-Geertsen [ ] Gareth Reakes [ x ] Gianugo Rabellino [ x ] Sam Ruby [ x ] Matt Sergeant [ x ] Ilene Seelemann [ ] Kimbro Staken [ x ] Jason Stewart [ x ] Jeff Turner [ x ] Dirk-Willem van Gulik [ ] Peter B. West [ ] PeiYong Zhang [ ]
Ted
--------------------------------------------------------------------- In case of troubles, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
