Debbie Wilson wrote: > I recently found that if you have a dtd specified in an xml file and > that dtd file does not exist, you get the following: > <snip/> > > In my particular case, I specified that the parser was to be a > non-validating parser. I don't really need the dtd to be present. > > Is there a place I can log this as a crimson bug? Am I likely to get > a fix for this problem or is there really no further development on > crimson? Does anyone else have experience with such an issue?
Almost everyone has experience with this issue and it is not a parser "bug". If you declare a DTD in your XML instance, then the parser *must* resolve it. This needs to happen even if you set the parser to be non-validating. Every XML framework needs to employ a "Catalog Entity Resolver", i.e. http://xml.apache.org/commons/components/resolver/ (Please do not send HTML-formatted email to mailing lists.) --David --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
