How does this play into the idea of creating an XML federation of projects? If the commons part was to be put into the Apache commons project, could we still reference it within the XML project (or really web site).
I am not intimately accross the commons stuff - what do others who are involved think?
Cheers,
BerinDavid Crossley wrote:
David Crossley wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I see the Apache Jakarta Commons project being referred to as "Apache Commons" or even just plain "Commons". Then there is the new "real" top-level Apache Commons project, whose home page mentions the confusion between it and Apache Jakarta Commons. but does not even mention Apache XML Commons.
This is not good for the visibility of the Apache XML Commons project. Should XML Commons be re-named, or perhaps even merged with the new Apache Commons?
<snipped an irrelevant comment/>
This topic did not receive any reply on the "XML Commons" mailing list so now trying on [EMAIL PROTECTED] ...
Today we saw evidence of user confusion: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xml-apache-general&m=107274000508241
--David
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
