Also - I'd hate to think we would be arbitrarily restricted by what the documentation states a particular part of xml is for. If those looking after commons think something is a good idea, but it doesn't quite fit with what is documented, put it to the general list and we can all comment!
Cheers, Berin
David Crossley wrote:
<quote> http://xml.apache.org/commons/#java Apache-authored code xml-commons' secondary goal is to provide a project space for small XML-related utilities that are being used in *multiple* other xml.apache.org projects </quote>
Would someone please clarify the intention of those words.
It can be read in two ways ...
A) Having the utilities at xml-commons enables them to be used by various other projects, thus avoiding duplication.
B) The utilities cannot live at xml-commons until they are used by at least two other xml.apache.org projects.
I hope that A) is the intention.
--David
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]