Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I'm glad we get some wind back into the Batik project. This makes this
whole process a lot easier (at least emotionally).
[..]
The Xerces people put all their active committers automatically into the
PMC. So question number one: Should we do that, too? I don't think this
is a bad idea. What do you people think about this and what are the
arguments for and against?
I think it makes sense that all active and willing committers
are on the PMC (and I think it's like this on most other projects)
Question number two is about commit rights. I guess we will keep a
separate set of committers for Batik and FOP and will create a common
space available to all committers when it comes to developing joint
components (like the PDF and PS transcoders). Is everybody ok with this
+1
[..]
What remains to do?
- Decide on open points (see above)
- Raise any concerns about the current course of action.
- Finalize both the resolution and charter (although the latter is not a
prerequisite for the PMC to be created AFAIK)
- Propose candidates for the chair (and vote on one)
IIRC the PMC chair is voted by the PMC members so we first need the PMC ...
- Fill in the names of the initial PMC and its chair into the board
resolution draft.
- Present the proposal to the board (after a positive vote on the whole
thing).
Let's get this over with within the next couple of weeks.
+1
Christian
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
