Visually I like [2] better, but I think [1] will create fewer problems over time (for example, with the ML address, [EMAIL PROTECTED] will probably cause fewer typing problems than [EMAIL PROTECTED]) So a slight preference for [1], although either is OK with me.
I agree that [3] would not be a good idea. Glen --- Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I agree with your argument about emphasis, but [2] > would be a precedent > at Apache. Brian Behlendorf hinted at > "xmlgraphics.apache.org" which is > also my preference. [3] is probably not realistic. > Besides "xml-graphics" > would probably look peculiar besides "xmlbeans", > even thought they don't > have a space in the project name. > > We should decide on that real quick so I can request > the subdomain, > mailing lists (General and PMC) and Wiki. > > On 09.10.2004 17:10:46 Clay Leeds wrote: > > On that note... what will the new hostname (I > think that's the > > terminology) for the Apache XML Graphics be > called? > > > > We probably will need to 'vote' on this until > after the Apache XML > > Graphics PMC is created (if we even need to vote > on this). My > > preferences is for option [2], as it helps clarify > and emphasize the > > two aspects of the new project "xml" & "graphics", > which I think will > > help with branding. There may be other ideas on > how it should look, but > > these are a few > > <snip/> > > > [1] > > http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/ > > [2] > > http://xml-graphics.apache.org/ > > [3] > > http://xml.graphics.apache.org/ > > > Jeremias Maerki > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
