Very nice--I like the xmlgraphics logo, and the layout of the text is well done.
Thanks for the comments, Glen!
I think in general having fewer pages but of higher quality is preferable.
Glen
I agree that having fewer pages is prefereable. However, because one of the things we're trying to do with the Apache XML Graphics Project is generate interest (members, users, contributors, etc.), my sense is that we should present content which helps 'legitimize' the project (that may be a poor choice of words...).
In other words, having few documents might make xmlgraphics 'appear' less 'legitimate'.
To help us identify the pages which might be good to add, I've placed the relevant pages from the Nav tab for xml.apache.org[2] below:
("[*]" indicates items I think make sense for xmlgraphics, and [?] are questionable and [x])
About
- Welcome [*]
- News [?] gets stale easily!
- Mission [?] stated on Welcome page
- Guidelines [?] ???
Projects [*]
- FOP [*]
- Batik [*]
Community [*]
- Who We Are [*]
- Credits [x] spelled out in Who We Are
Resources [x]
- Downloads [x]
- Bug Database [x]
- Wiki [?] will there be a XMLGraphics wiki separate from FOP &/or Batik?
- Gump [x]
Information [*]
- Get Involved [*]
- CVS Repositories [*]
- Mailing Lists [*]
- Reference [*]
- Legal Stuff [*]
- Contact Info [*]
More thoughts and comments?
[1]
http://homepage.mac.com/webmaestro/xml-fop/xml-graphics/
[2] http://xml.apache.org/
Web Maestro Clay -- Clay Leeds - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Webmaster/Developer - Medata, Inc. - <http://www.medata.com/> PGP Public Key: <https://mail.medata.com/pgp/cleeds.asc>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
