On 11.11.2008 14:52:52 sebb wrote: > On 11/11/2008, Shane Curcuru <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 to dropping 1.2 support. > > +1 to dropping 1.2 > > +0 to dropping 1.3 > > I think 1.4 support should be kept if possible for a while yet.
Agreed. Xerces is such a basic library and so many companies are still stuck with Java 1.4 even though it's past EOL. > > Please - be sure that the main website clearly lists the last release we > > think that Xerces worked on JDK version x.y. Xerces is ubiquitous, and is > > used directly or within other products virtually everywhere. While we don't > > need to spend developer time worrying about ancient JDK versions, we should > > make it clear where people who have to stay on legacy systems can get an > > appropriate release. > > +1 > > > I'd love it if we ensured that we feature a prominent link and host the > > download for the zip/targz plus it's key file for "the last known good > > Xerces with JDK x.y" as we drop support for earlier releases. > > > > +1 > > > Thanks for bringing the item up! > > > > - Shane > > > > Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
