Hi, These are two reactions to the XML Graphics common components wiki page, other than the issue of the transcoders.
1. I do not like the term axgc; it makes sense in the apache organisation, but it is not a good name. The name used by Chris, xmlgraphics-commons.jar, is better. A real name would be best of course, but I do not have one. 2. I very much like the idea that modules such as PDFDocumentGraphics2D and PSDocumentGraphics2D become useful in other contexts than FOP alone. Regards, Simon -- Simon Pepping home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache XML Graphics Project URL: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
