Hi Jeremias,
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
A proposal 2a (a kind of compromise) would involve putting the basic
Graphics2D implementations in the Commons area (no dependencies on Batik).
The transcoders themselves would go into Batik.
This is what I envisioned all along.
Of course, this also splits this part in two, possibly making it harder for the Batik team when doing bigger improvements.
Since I'll have access to both the difference should be minor. The Graphics2D impls should logically be separate. You seemed to hint that there were Batik dependencies in these classes do you know what they are?
But I think it would address my (and Simon's) particular interest in
the Graphics2D implementations. So my question would be what Chris and Thomas (and everyone else, of course) think about this variant.
Just to give you an idea the only code I'm looking to transfer to Batik (roughly for PDF) is:
PDFImageElementBridge.java, PDFTextElementBridge.java PDFTextPainter.java, PDFTranscoder.java, SVGUserAgent.java FOPSAXSVGDocumentFactory.java, PDFAElementBridge.java, PDFANode.jav
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache XML Graphics Project URL: http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/ To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
