On 10/1/07, Cameron McCormack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jeremias Maerki: > > Any other questions you want answered? Any objection to taking Batik and > > Commons into the same questionaire and make the "Java 1.4 question" a > > project vote rather than a subproject vote? > > No, that's fine. Moving everything at once seems to be sensible, given > the interdependencies between the subprojects.
I agree. It makes sense for the Apache XML Graphics Project to try to alleviate as many of these issues as possible. > I would like the survey to find out whether jumping to Java 5 would be > acceptable. The Java 1.4 will reach its EOL when Java 7 comes out, > which according to this page is (northern hemisphere) summer 2008: > > http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/ > > So that's only 9 months away. Good point. Java 1.3 is a fair jump as it is, but it makes sense, that if we're going to make a leap anyway, we consider the further leap if it's within reach. At the very least, I agree it is good practice for us to consider asking the hard questions that will bring us closer to a release giving us the greatest benefit. > Could you also note in the survey that this versioning issue will apply > to a post-1.7 release of Batik. > > -- > Cameron McCormack, http://mcc.id.au/ > xmpp:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ▪ ICQ 26955922 ▪ MSN [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Regards, The Web Maestro -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - <http://homepage.mac.com/webmaestro/> My religion is simple. My religion is kindness. - HH The 14th Dalai Lama of Tibet
