> Not sure I understand what you wanted to say. I was trying to say that I felt that moving color utility code up to XGC was generally desirable and having to reverting back was a shame. By 'water down' I really meant reduce, which actually means the opposite! Sorry :-) .
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 12:19 PM, Jeremias Maerki <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 01.07.2010 13:03:43 Peter Hancock wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > > But I've just thought of a better alternative: > > > Moving (!) ColorExt back to FOP where it was and moving > > > GrayScaleConverter to FOP solves the whole problem with minimal effort > > > in FOP Trunk. > > Do you intend to refactor the static ColorUtil.toCMYKGrayColor method > > to a member of GrayScaleConverter? > > I planned to move the toCMYKGrayColor method back to FOP's ColorUtil > until things are resolved. > > > I think this move makes sense for this release but it is a shame to > > water down the color package in XGC. > > Not sure I understand what you wanted to say. > > > Pete > <snip/> > > > Jeremias Maerki > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
