Hi Simon,

Yes I did argue against an upgrade to 1.6 for the reasons stated at that time, i.e. improved annotation support. However, nearly another year on, Java 8 has been out for a while and additional reasons to upgrade emerge, i.e. allow us to leverage PDFBox improvements. Therefore, I'm +1 on going to 1.6.

However, I'm -1 on rushing to 7 or 8 for the reasons previously stated. FOP is a server process who user base will expect to run on a variety of different older operating systems including some mainframe systems, where upgrading Java requires the installation of many o/s patches. It can be very difficult to get approval to upgrade the o/s on such systems and therefore make it very difficult to move to newer versions of Java on such systems. So until they catch up a bit and there is a compelling reason to go to 7 or 8, I say moving to 1.6 for the imminent v2.0 release is a good plan.

BTW, I think we should keep general@ in the loop as this decision has an impact on all the sub projects in XML Graphics umbrella

Thanks,

Chris

On 18/06/2014 14:20, Simon Steiner wrote:

Hi,

As part of the work on merging fonts in PDFs:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2302

I am using PDFBox 2.0 instead of 1.8 since that version has switched from AWT to its own fontfile parser/renderer to give better support for different fonts.

This version requires Java 6 but FOP is currently supporting Java 5, does Java 5 still need to be supported?

Thanks



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to