> > In the schema I sent you, there an attribute called
> > "CancellationDateTime".  This is actually an object of type
> > "DateTime".  If I'm dynamically creating objects, how can I
> > programmatically figure out that setting "CancellationDateTime"
> > actually needs "DateTIme"?
> >
>
> Tennis -
>
> There is some support for this in generateDS.py, but it is hidden
> and is currently only used for user methods.  See:
> http://www.rexx.com/~dkuhlman/generateDS.html#user-methods<http://www.rexx.com/%7Edkuhlman/generateDS.html#user-methods>


Cool. I hadn't thought of the user methods.  Thanks.

>
>
> Make the following change to generateDS.py.  Then, I believe that
> it will give you what you are asking for:
>
> # -----------------------------------------------------------------
> --- Tmp/generateDS.py   2009-07-09 08:42:22.000000000 -0700
> +++ generateDS.py       2009-07-09 08:41:05.000000000 -0700
> @@ -3085,7 +3085,7 @@
>     else:
>         s1 = 'class %s%s(GeneratedsSuper):\n' % (prefix, name)
>     wrt(s1)
> -    if UserMethodsModule:
> +    if True:
>         generateMemberSpec(outfile, element)
>     wrt('    subclass = None\n')
>     superclass_name = 'None'
> # -----------------------------------------------------------------


Even better. :)  Thanks.

>
>
> Here is a comment that explains a bit about what that change will
> cause generateDS.py to produce:
>
> #
> # Generate a class variable whose value is a list of tuples, one
> #   tuple for each member data item of the class.
> #   Each tuble has 3 elements: (1) member name, (2) member data type,
> #   (3) container/list or not (maxoccurs > 1).
>
> OK, so actually, it generates a list of instances that are
> effectively 3-tuples.
>
> Here is an example -- Something like the following is added to each
> generated class:
>
>    _member_data_items = [
>        _MemberSpec('Size', 'xs:integer', 0),
>        _MemberSpec('Code', 'xs:string', 0),
>        _MemberSpec('Name', 'xs:string', 0),
>        o
>        o
>        o
>        ]
>
> Would a dictionary in which you could do a look-up by member
> name be more convenient?


No thanks. You've already done more than enough. :)

>
>
> If this is what you need and you think this might be generally
> useful, I'll add a command line option so that you can generate
> this even when you do not want the user methods stuff.
>
> > Hope that makes some kinda sense. ;-)
>
> Hope my reply does, too.


It did. Thanks.

>
>
> - Dave
>
> --
>
>
> Dave Kuhlman
> http://www.rexx.com/~dkuhlman <http://www.rexx.com/%7Edkuhlman>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge  
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time, 
vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full prize  
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
generateds-users mailing list
generateds-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/generateds-users

Reply via email to