Well, for these functions, I think it would be best to use the libraries
that are already out there, rather than write our own. I only really know
about the libs that are part of the C++ standard (although I'm a bit weak
yet on the STL), but I'm open to using any lib that is available for open
source projects. The lib just has to be (relatively) compact and
reliable.
Since I've been looking at date implementations for so long recently, I
haven't looked in detail at the other libs that we'll need. I use the
standard string.h at work, but there are rumors of a better lib for
strings out there. Since string manipulation will be one of the key
functions, we might want to investigate these other options.
I'd like to concentrate more on the functions and classes that are unique
to genealogy for this project, and leave as much of the standard functions
and libraries to using what's already out there (whether it's part of the
standard or not).
--
Sean Lamb
Chief Webmaster, SCWD, NMRA --- http://www.scwd-nmra.org
Historian and Webmaster, Capitol City "N"Gineers ---
http://www.msn.fullfeed.com/~slambo/capcity.htm
Madison Linux User Group --- http://www.madisonlinux.org
On Mon, 17 Apr 2000, Geert Vantienen wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here is my question:
> Which low level datastructure implementations are we going to use ?
> I mean: which (good) String class ?
> which List, Map, ... template implementations ?
> Or are we going to write our own classes/templates for this ?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Geert
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> - Geert Vantienen http://chat.sesuadra.org/ -
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Genes-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/genes-devel
>
>
_______________________________________________
Genes-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/genes-devel
