-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 24 Jul 2012 21:44:10 +0200 Norman Feske (NF) wrote:
NF> what do you mean by "full revoke of the range"? NF> NF> If a PD cap goes away, won't this implicitly revoke everything from NF> the PD anyway? (including the not-yet-finished range of the preempted NF> revoke operation) If so, this looks like a non-issue to me. Or does NF> the preempted revoke happen to yield to leaking resources in any way? What I'm saying is... an operation that starts out as a directed revoke will turn into a revoke on the entire subtree if the PD cap goes away while the revoke operation is preempted. Simply because at the time the revoke is restarted, the limitation "only this single PD" can no longer be applied. Cheers, Udo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlAPAM8ACgkQnhRzXSM7nSnJZQCbBiEi39eV9kn2874FI8gWO6rh 64cAnjWzMxiAkZzNoIO/BBJF3O27yxPD =8HYf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Genode-main mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/genode-main
