> I suspect that the poor networking performance stems from the dde_ipxe > networking driver, not L4Linux. I would definitely recommend to > benchmark the dde_ipxe networking driver individually without L4Linux. > E.g., by adding some code to the driver that transmits a predefined > network packet and measure the throughput achieved.
Yes, thanks, we will. anyway I guess in nearest future high-performance network subsystem (Stack, drivers) will be one of the our priority tasks. > > Another test would be to connect two L4Linux instances via nic_bridge > and perform the benchmark between both instances. If the communication > over the virtual network performs well, we can rule out L4Linux and the > 'Nic_session' interface from being the problem. We use own realization of communication of two L4Linux. We will compare performance of nic_bridge and our realization. Now our performance via 2 L4Linux around 184 Mb. Performance PC->NIC->L4Linux is 94Mb. I think performance L4Linux->NIC->L4Linux will the same. -- Sartakov A. Vasily ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Everyone hates slow websites. So do we. Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics Download AppDynamics Lite for free today: http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar _______________________________________________ Genode-main mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/genode-main
