On 01/28/2014 01:49 PM, Анна Будкина wrote: > > 2014-01-28 Sebastian Sumpf <sebastian.su...@genode-labs.com > <mailto:sebastian.su...@genode-labs.com>> > > On 01/28/2014 01:20 PM, Christian Helmuth wrote: > > Sebastian, > > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 01:07:19PM +0100, Sebastian Sumpf wrote: > >> Thanks for your tests! But I don't like the 65 MBit/s thing! What is > >> going on? Is this RX or TX? > > > > Complete netperf output follows > > > > ---------------------------- TCP_STREAM ----------------------- > > spawn netperf-2.6.0 -H 10.0.0.65 -P 1 -v 2 -t TCP_STREAM -c -C -- > -m 1024 > > MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to > 10.0.0.65 () port 0 AF_INET > > Recv Send Send Utilization > Service Demand > > Socket Socket Message Elapsed Send Recv > Send Recv > > Size Size Size Time Throughput local remote > local remote > > bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/s % S % U > us/KB us/KB > > > > 87380 16384 1024 10.02 65.59 34.95 -1.00 > 174.598 -1.249 > > > > Alignment Offset Bytes Bytes Sends Bytes > Recvs > > Local Remote Local Remote Xfered Per Per > > Send Recv Send Recv Send (avg) Recv (avg) > > 8 8 0 0 82158592 1024.00 80233 8905.12 > 9226 > > > > Maximum > > Segment > > Size (bytes) > > 1448 > > > > calculation: overall bytes / size per packet / time = packets per > second > > 82158592 Bytes / 1024 Bytes / 10.02 s = 8007 > packets/s > > > > ! PERF: TCP_STREAM 65.59 MBit/s ok > > > > ---------------------------- TCP_MAERTS ----------------------- > > spawn netperf-2.6.0 -H 10.0.0.65 -P 1 -v 2 -t TCP_MAERTS -c -C -- > -m 1024 > > MIGRATED TCP MAERTS TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to > 10.0.0.65 () port 0 AF_INET > > Recv Send Send Utilization > Service Demand > > Socket Socket Message Elapsed Recv Send > Recv Send > > Size Size Size Time Throughput local remote > local remote > > bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/s % S % U > us/KB us/KB > > > > 87380 16384 1024 10.00 543.35 39.06 -1.00 > 23.555 -0.151 > > > > Alignment Offset Bytes Bytes Recvs Bytes > Sends > > Local Remote Local Remote Xfered Per Per > > Recv Send Recv Send Recv (avg) Send (avg) > > 8 8 0 0 679280808 13875.90 48954 > 16384.00 41474 > > > > Maximum > > Segment > > Size (bytes) > > 1448 > > > > calculation: overall bytes / size per packet / time = packets per > second > > 679280808 Bytes / 1024 Bytes / 10.00 s = 66336 > packets/s > > > > ! PERF: TCP_MAERTS 543.35 MBit/s ok > > > > > > The manual states > > > > TCP_STREAM It is quite simple, transferring some quantity of data > > from the system running netperf to the system running > > netserver. > > TCP_MAERTS A TCP_MAERTS (MAERTS is STREAM backwards) test is “just > > like” a TCP_STREAM test except the data flows from the > > netserver to the netperf. > > > > So, the scenario is much slower if the Genode side is _receiving_. > > Without cursing: This is no good! I will look into that!
> Thank you very much for the reply! I will try to use Genode on Nova to > perform these tests. So, it is x86 i guess. Sebastian ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ WatchGuard Dimension instantly turns raw network data into actionable security intelligence. It gives you real-time visual feedback on key security issues and trends. Skip the complicated setup - simply import a virtual appliance and go from zero to informed in seconds. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=123612991&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Genode-main mailing list Genode-main@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/genode-main
