Hello Erik,

There are a few things going on that may contribute to the differences you 
notice, but overall, we double checked and think that the exon concatenation is 
being performed correctly. With a gene this large, a perfect alignment is not 
expected.

In your first query, data from the RefSeq Gene's track is being returned. The 
mRna sequence is returned. The mRna can differ slightly from the genomic 
reference sequence for many tracks.

In the second query, data from the UCSC Gene's track is being returned. The 
genomic reference sequence is being returned - the portions covered by the mRna 
alignment. The UCSC Gene track includes the RefSeq sequence above (for this 
case, an earlier version, explained next), with some input from other data 
sources.

In general, we would normally expect both tracks to have very similar data, 
however a closer inspection shows that the UCSC Gene uses an older version of 
the RefSeq (.2) and the RefSeq Gene track uses the brand new (Nov 2009) version 
of the RefSeq (.3).

The genbank record describes the assembly process for this transcript and notes 
that portions of genomic were used - very likely NCBI Build 37 for version .3, 
where the previous version either did not use genomic or used an earlier NCBI 
Build (36 or earlier). The Genbank data record does not specific state which 
version of the human genome was used for either version, but this is a likely 
assumption based on the release dates of the versions, and one that you could 
follow up on with a little analysis (or better, by contacting the RefSeq 
project and asking) if the change is of interest to you.

Thank you for so carefully examining the data and explaining the situation. If 
you notice anything else a bit off and would like us to look into it, please 
feel welcomed to send question like this along. 

Jennifer

------------------------------------------------ 
Jennifer Jackson 
UCSC Genome Bioinformatics Group 

----- "Erik Miller" <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: "Erik Miller" <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Monday, December 7, 2009 1:05:02 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
> Subject: [Genome] randomly changing shared browser sessions
>
> Hello,
> 
> I created and shared a custom browser session with my colleagues but
> configurations of the session (such as colors, orders, and scales of
> custom tracks) often change randomly. No one else but myself has
> access to my UCSC GB account. Why is this happening and how can I stop
> it?
> 
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> Erik Miller
> Ph.D. Student
> Gerald Crabtree Lab
> Genetics Department
> Stanford University
> _______________________________________________
> Genome maillist  -  [email protected]
> https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome
_______________________________________________
Genome maillist  -  [email protected]
https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome

Reply via email to