Hello, From examining the statistics at NCBI and from UCSC, the data looks in sync. Note that any updates through Mar 22 (Today, Monday) at NCBI will show up at UCSC (track last update Mar 19 (Friday) at the next update.
Any changes can be explored at NCBI - there are statistics for what is under review (add/change/delete). They may be able to also address specific question about changes. The table kgAlias can be linked to the CCDS track, but the table is part of the UCSC Genes track. All genes in the UCSC Gene track have a "canonical" transcript. However, only certainly types of genes are included in the CCDS track (coding + other criteria). Read the track description/methods/source for each to understand the input and processing details. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/CCDS/CcdsBrowse.cgi?REQUEST=SHOW_STATISTICS Current statistics for Mus musculus for build 37.1 March 22, 2010 CCDS Totals CCDS IDs 17,707 Mouse July 2007 (NCBI37/mm9) Assembly CCDS Track/Consensus CDS Data last updated: 2010-03-19 Primary Table: ccdsGene Row Count: 17,704 Thanks, Jennifer --------------------------------- Jennifer Jackson UCSC Genome Informatics Group http://genome.ucsc.edu/ On 3/22/10 11:07 AM, Vaclav Janousek wrote: > Hi, > I figured out that in the mm9.ccdsgene table is 42 items missing if I > compare that with CCDS original table on NCBI. But gene symbols of > these 42 genes I was able to find in the mm9.kgAlias table. Does it > mean that these 42 genes is non-canonical splicing forms and the > canonical forms of these loci are not present in CCDS? > Thanks > > Vaclav Janousek > _______________________________________________ > Genome maillist - [email protected] > https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome _______________________________________________ Genome maillist - [email protected] https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome
