Hello, I have been doing comparative analysis on the hg18 March 2006 assembly. Sometimes there will be a high PhastCons score even though the graphs that display the conservation of each animal individually are very pale/non-existent and vice versa. Do you know if it is better to focus on the density graphs or PhastCons score when trying to get an idea of conservation in a particular region? Here is the link for the session.
http://genome.ucsc.edu/cgi-bin/hgSession?hgsid=136701439&hgS_doSessionDetail=hg18_strong_graphs_no_phast Thanks, Hannah _______________________________________________ Genome maillist - [email protected] https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome
