Hi All,

The explanation supplied is not adequate.
The RefSeq project supplies information on transcripts that are unique - and
on the NCBI (which created refseq), indeed, there is only ONE record per
acession. (Try a simple search in Entrez). Indeed, the refseq project often
supplies muliple accession for the same or similar loci with various
splices. That's the whole point. It's a conservative approach - one name,
one transcript.
There is a mistake in the adaptation of their database to yours. Your
explanation makes no sense unless you went and did all the alignments and
selection from scratch - and if that's the case, why would you call it a
RefSeq track?

maayan


On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 12:08 AM, Pauline Fujita <[email protected]>wrote:

> Hello Maayan,
>
> Please see this previously answered mailing list question about the same
> issue:
>
> https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/pipermail/genome/2010-November/024242.html
>
> Hopefully this information was helpful and answers your question. If you
> have further questions or require clarification feel free to contact the
> mailing list at [email protected].
>
> Regards,
>
> Pauline Fujita
> UCSC Genome Bioinformatics Group
> http://genome.ucsc.edu
>
>
>
> On 11/24/10 01:08, maayan kreitzman wrote:
>
>> Hi there,
>> I've found a kind of serious problem with your database which is based on
>> the RefSeq project.
>> Many of the refseq accessions, when queried from the genome browser return
>> more than one gene, IN COMPLETELY DIFFERENT LOCATIONS.
>> If you search, say, NM_198181, this is the case. Sometimes, like in the
>> case
>> of NM_020364, the different entries are even on opposite strands.
>> if you want a longer list of examples like this, I can send you some more.
>> The mistake is somewhere in the conversion from the RefSeq database to
>> your
>> software, because if you search the same accessions in Entrez you get, as
>> expected, ONE gene.
>> Reqseq documents specific, unique, verified transcripts. There should not
>> be
>> more than one set of coordinates for each refseq accession.
>> maayan
>> _______________________________________________
>> Genome maillist  -  [email protected]
>> https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Genome maillist  -  [email protected]
https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome

Reply via email to