The same case for rs222. There are 3200 allele samples based on http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/snp_ref.cgi?rs=222,
But there are only 2552 samples based on genome browser (T,C, 1823.000000,729.000000) Did NCBI update their dbSNP database just recently? Sean -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Xiang Li Sent: Sunday, August 07, 2011 8:15 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [Genome] allele_copy_num inconsistent with NCBI dbSNP record forrs538 Hi, Dear support, Could you please help me understand why the allele_copy_num is different from NCBI dbSNP record for rs538. Based on http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/projects/SNP/snp_ref.cgi?rs=538, there are hundreds of samples in HapMap pilot studies. However, UCSC genome browser shows there are only 19 allele copy numbers there: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------- alleles: G,T,C allele_copy_num: 1.000000,4.000000,14.000000 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------- If I don't include the samples in HapMap pilot studies, the number would match exactly. This is just one of many examples. Can you please help me understand what rules were used by you to derive those numbers, such as why not include HapMap pilot studies? Thanks. Best Sean _______________________________________________ Genome maillist - [email protected] https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome _______________________________________________ Genome maillist - [email protected] https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome
