Hi Kawaji, Thank you for contacting us a few weeks ago to point out an error in our bigWigMerge script. This issue has been resolved, and the fixed version will be available next week. Thanks again for bringing this to our attention.
Regards, --- Luvina Guruvadoo UCSC Genome Bioinformatics Group On 7/11/2011 10:14 AM, Luvina Guruvadoo wrote: > Hi Kawaji, > > It looks like you have found a bug in our script. Thank you for bringing > this to our attention. Please contact us again at [email protected] if > you have any further questions. > > --- > Luvina Guruvadoo > UCSC Genome Bioinformatics Group > > > On 7/7/2011 5:23 PM, KAWAJI Hideya wrote: >> Dear the developers, >> >> I found bigWigMerge included in the source tree is very useful, but >> found different outputs depending on the order of files, which is not >> expected from its description ("bigWigMerge - Merge together multiple >> bigWigs into a single output bedGraph"). >> >> $ bigWigToBedGraph t1.bw /dev/stdout >> chr1 10000 10001 1 >> chr2 20000 20001 1 >> >> $ bigWigToBedGraph t2.bw /dev/stdout >> chr1 1000 20001 1 >> >> $ bigWigMerge t1.bw t2.bw /dev/stdout >> chr1 1000 10000 1 >> chr1 10000 10001 2 >> chr1 10001 20001 1 >> chr2 20000 20001 1 >> >> # this is the expected result >> >> $ bigWigMerge t2.bw t1.bw /dev/stdout >> chr1 10000 10001 2 >> chr1 10001 20001 1 >> >> # two lines disappeared >> >> >> >> best wishes, >> Kawaji H. >> _______________________________________________ >> Genome maillist - [email protected] >> https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome >> > _______________________________________________ > Genome maillist - [email protected] > https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome _______________________________________________ Genome maillist - [email protected] https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome
