Hi, YingWang. Sorry, we don't align the XM or XR records. We only try to align NM_ and NR_ records.
For more information, see this previously answered mailing list question: https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/pipermail/genome/2006-December/012463.html Please let us know if you have any additional questions: [email protected] - Greg Roe UCSC Genome Bioinformatics Group On 7/23/12 2:45 PM, YingWang wrote: > To whom it may concerned, > > I am trying to use the RefSeq annotation form UCSC , because of your > multiple options for file format. > > But I found that all the transcripts with XR_ and XM_ prefix are excluded in > the Refseq of UCSC annotations. But the XR_ and XM_ are included in the > NCBI's annotation. > > I noticed that , UCSC said "RefSeq RNAs were aligned against the human genome > using blat; those with an alignment of less than 15% were discarded." > > Does it mean that all the XR_ and XM_ transcripts do not passing the UCSC > filter or UCSC have not contain them before filter? > > Thank you > > Ying > > 2012-07-24 > > > > YingWang > _______________________________________________ > Genome maillist - [email protected] > https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome _______________________________________________ Genome maillist - [email protected] https://lists.soe.ucsc.edu/mailman/listinfo/genome
