On 03-04-2012 08:37:57 -0000, Gregory M. Turner wrote: > Current prefix SOP is to epatch a bunch of files with > @GENTOO_PORTAGE_EPREFIX@ and then eprefixify the affected files. Although > this adds a bit of precision and flexibility, it leads to laundry lists in > the ebuild, especially if/when we start getting more rigorous about > prefixification. The attached eclass provides eprefixify_patch, which simply > prefixifies the patch itself before applying.
Feels dirty too ;)
> It also includes some quick & dirty tools to prefixify /bin/{ba,}sh shebangs.
> I'm using both in my overlay. So far, so good. What I'm using it /for/ is
> a more interesting question that I'd like to bring up in a separate,
> presumably more controversial thread. Anyhow, for the moment I thought these
> might come in handy or at least precipitate an interesting flamewar :)
I fail to see how this is necessary. Portage already fixes those/these
shebangs, doesn't it?
Fabian
--
Fabian Groffen
Gentoo on a different level
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
