On 27-11-2017 14:31:29 +0100, Michael Haubenwallner wrote: > Hi Fabian, > > On 11/27/2017 11:07 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I've just finished removing all few remaining interrevisions (-r0.XY) > > ebuilds from the prefix tree. > > > > In the next Portage release, interrevision support will be removed. > > Please don't!
Ok! > > I believe we no longer need to modify ebuilds so often, and keeping this > > feature is now a deviation from mainline which we better avoid. > > Although I've not managed yet to submit as GLEP or so, having interrevisions > is quite important to me - and for a meta distribution in general I believe. [snipping reasons as to why interrevisions are useful] Would it be acceptable to "ban" the interrevisions from the prefix-tree, but keep support in Prefix Portage? Thanks, Fabian -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
