On Sat, 23 Jul 2005, Matt Randolph wrote:
> Sean Johnson wrote: > > > LOL! > > That must be for the folk that don't mind patching glibc, but will get > > upset if memcpy does strange things. :) > > > > > > You try to do a good turn and they laugh at you. That'll teach me. Heh ;-) I would like to see a version of memcpy.c that DOES do something malicious, without being completely obvious. This isn't Windows, a seg-fault isn't going to take down the kernel, or corrupt the filesystem;) Cheers Ian -- [email protected] mailing list
