Yeah, netcat, hehe.

emerge -pv netcat
...
[ebuild  N    ] net-analyzer/netcat                                   
[110-r8]                       -GAPING_SECURITY_HOLE +crypt -ipv6
-static 107 kB

I would be interested in a USE flag for this glibc patch.

On 7/31/05, Ben Skeggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Duncan wrote:
> 
> >Brian Hall posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted
> >below,  on Sun, 31 Jul 2005 08:56:00 -0600:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Perhaps a USE flag could be created to enable the glibc patches, then a
> >>emerge --newuse could recompile glibc and the problem apps (or
> >>everything); maybe a mini-howto document would also be helpful.
> >>
> >>I would certainly like an easy way to enable any "free" performance
> >>boost I can get!
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Something like USE=dangerous-amd64-hack? <g>
> >
> >(Seriously, there at least used to be a local use flag
> >USE=frickin-big-security-hole, or some such, on some app I can't remember
> >at the moment.  Turns out a teacher was using that app in his class as a
> >an example or something, so the dev left the ability to create it there,
> >but with a USE flag nobody in their right mind would normally enable.  I
> >wish I could remember what it was, but grepping use.local.desc for
> >anything that might be related doesn't seem to bring it up.  Perhaps the
> >app, or anyway the USE flag, has now been removed from portage?)
> >
> >The use.local.desc description could point to the bug, which is IIRC what
> >the one above did, for those wanting more information about just why such
> >a USE flag exists, and just why someone might be persuaded to enable it.
> >
> >
> >
> Are you talking about GAPING_SECURITY_HOLE?  If so, this flag is still
> in use by the net-analyzer/netcat package.  It enables the "-E" (iirc)
> switch
> which allows you to do something like:
>        nc -l -p 12345 -E /bin/bash
> 
> This(or something close to it) would cause netcat to listen on port 12345,
> and forward the person who connects to it a nice bash shell.
> 
> Ben.
> --
> [email protected] mailing list
> 
>

-- 
[email protected] mailing list

Reply via email to