-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Daiajo Tibdixious wrote:
> I had a weird situation on my computer, which ended with a panic, and
> during that firefox-bin would not save target files consistently, and
> would actually crash. I'll detail this situation first,
> in case its relevant. I run stable CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu"
> 
> Firstly rtorrent crashed with a segment fault. It restarted and worked.
> The next day firefox-bin would not "save link as", I could  navigate
> to a directory, and on pushing "save" either nothing would happen or
> firefox would crash.
> 
> I emerged the latest mozilla-firefox-bin without any trouble, but
> almost every package in world failed MD5 verification on the tarball.
> 
<snip>
> 
> firefox-bin still refuses to save links, but no longer crashes, but
> after some time idling, it eats all CPU and has to be kill -9'd.
> 
> I'm getting by with Konqueror, however Google Mail is not very nice in
> this browser.
> So not a big problem, just worried that it might be symptomatic of
> something serious.

Up until recently I've been seeing the same (or very similar; mine only
ever crashed, never hung hogging CPU) problem downloading files in
firefox-bin; if I tried to browse to a different folder to save in it
triggered a crash, but if I saved in the folder it started in it would
work.  I don't use firefox-bin much, only for those (few) flash sites I
want to see, so I didn't really care much about this problem.  Anyway, I
just tried it again now, and it actually works fine for me now.  Not
sure why it works now, but one possibile cause that I found & fixed
yesterday, is that there was an old libc-2.3.4 in /emul/linux/x86/lib
that was being found before the libc-2.4 in /lib32.  "Equery belongs"
showed the old libc wasn't owned by any installed ebuild, so I moved it,
and that resolved the problems (unrelated to firefox-bin) that had
revealed the stale /emul/linux/x86/lib files in the first place.  Not
sure if that's actually what had been causing my firefox-bin crash or
not, but I think it's a reasonable possibility.

Hope you getting it working,
Conway S. Smith
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFElwC+GL3AU+cCPDERAkeKAJ4l/HkCqR21C6AKppFAinPj7mDzlACfbW9U
6auhk/faHzchf1yfQe+SAeE=
=ZoJR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
[email protected] mailing list

Reply via email to