xorg-server-1.0.*  is compatible with up to the latest version of
ati-drivers - I have yet to reboot into 2.6.17 but have heard of no
issues with kernel.
If you are running ~amd64 you will need to to either match Duncan's
open-source piety or  mask a few xorg things as there has been an ABI
change in xorg-server which has not been picked up in ati-drivers yet.
My /etc/portage/package.mask includes the following lines ATM:

=x11-base/xorg-server-1.1.0-r1
=x11-base/xorg-x11-7.1
=x11-drivers/xf86-input-keyboard-1.1.0
=x11-drivers/xf86-input-mouse-1.1.1

W.

Norm Heinen wrote:
> xorg modular has been in for several version of ati-drivers.
> You'll need to unmask by keyword the latest drivers in portage. Which
> at this time is 8.25.18
>
> I know they work on 2.6.16, however I can't confirm they work on
> 2.6.17. But I see no reason why they shouldn't.
>
> emerge -av ati-drivers
>
>
> On 6/21/06, Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> "Mark Knecht" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
>> below, on  Tue, 20 Jun 2006 17:12:54 -0700:
>>
>> >    Just wondering if there is a known good ati-drivers package in
>> > portage for linux-2.6.17, either in the kernel.org or gentoo versions.
>>
>> No problem with x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati (6.6.1) here.  Kernel 2.6.17
>> (kernel.org vanilla), xorg-7.1, compiled with gcc 4.1.1.
>>
>> Of course, I don't use slaveryware, so don't use the slaveryware ati
>> drivers.  I haven't read of any kernel issues with them, but last I
>> read,
>> they didn't have a version for xorg-modular, either 7.0 or 7.1, yet.
>> That is of course one of the problems with using slaveryware, users are
>> dependent on the whims of their software master for updates, which often
>> lag the freedomware versions, if the master deigns to release updates at
>> all. The Nvidia slaves' master is likewise lagging.
>>
>> -- 
>> Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
>> "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
>> and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman
>>
>> -- 
>> [email protected] mailing list
>>
>>
-- 
[email protected] mailing list

Reply via email to