Richard Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Sun, 03 Sep 2006 22:44:14 -0400:
>> timidity++-2.13.2-r2[0]: ~amd64 ~arm ~ppc ppc64 ~sparc ~x86 >> >> So the -r2 that's ~amd64 is already stable on ppc64. > > Ugh - and that is what I get for being blind (but hey, doesn't anybody > else glance first for x86?)... :) > As usual you seem to have the gist of it. I actually am an AT, so if it > works for me I'll see what the state seems to be and keyword STABLE in > bugzilla if it makes sense (noting the caveats you listed). Will be a > day or two though so if anybody else beats me to it I'm sure the powers > that be will be happy to see one less package falling behind x86... :) Hey, herdstat is still new to me, so this gave me a chance to play with my new toy a bit. =8^) I've had earch installed since it was posted on -dev, tho, and find myself using it rather regularly. =8^) In terms of falling behind x86, how are we actually doing compared to them since they actually got an arch team and arch testers, and made it policy that maintainers didn't keyword for x86 unless they got permission from x86 to do their own packages? With more QA now, I'm guessing things will be a bit slower for them, and we shouldn't do to bad against them now. Of course, quality will be higher on x86 than it was before as well. Anyway, I'm wondering how the stats are going since they actually became a proper arch, arch-team and all, as I've not seen any numbers or comments on the topic since then. Nothing like a little friendly competition once in awhile. =8^) -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman -- [email protected] mailing list
