On Tue, Sep 19, 2006 at 07:09:00AM +0200, Pawel Kraszewski wrote:
> Dnia sobota, 16 wrze?nia 2006 09:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisa?:
>
> > # Onboard Gigabit
> > KERNEL=="eth*", SYSFS{address}=="00:E0:81:2A:58:C6", NAME="eth0"
>
>
> At my EM64T computer I have this '10-eth.rules':
>
> KERNEL=="eth*", SYSFS{address}=="00:11:22:33:44:55", NAME="eth0"
> KERNEL=="eth*", SYSFS{address}=="55:44:33:22:11:00", NAME="eth1"
>
> It looks exactly like your (well, MACs are fake. However, in real MACs i have
> letters lowercase, which is NOT what Juergen suggested) - and it works. I had
> once "wandering" interfaces - 2 cards were randomly assigned to eth0 and
> eth1 - which was strange, because they are 2 diff cards and modules were
> loaded always in the same sequence.
>
> I am using sys-fs/udev-100-r2
Same version here. I have another system, x86 instead of ~amd64, with
four PCI cards with network interfaces on them among other things, and
it always assigns ports in a consistent order, and it has
10-net.rules.
Maybe I will try changing the name to 10-eth, altho I don't see what
difference the name makes.
I am reluctant to use completely different names, like net* instead of
eth*, because so many scripts know the interface names. I may have to
try that, but it seems strange that your EM64T obeys it, so does my
x86, but my ~amd64 doesn't.
--
... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E 6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933
I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o
--
[email protected] mailing list
