On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 04:35:43PM -0600, Homer Parker wrote:
> On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 06:46 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I use mozilla without javascript, java, etc, which probably eliminates
> > most of the security problems.
>
> Ok, you use it like that. I bet there are people that don't though and
> the mozilla team doesn't have the time/resources to fix the security
> problems, and upstream has dropped support. If you want to continue to
> use it with those problems, great... Dump it in your overlay and use
> it.. Just remember it's unsupported and has security problems and if it
> breaks you get to keep both pieces ;)
I will have to stop using it someday, and I won't bother with an
overlay. But last time I tried seamonkey it was unstable unreliable
junk. What I want to understand is why seamonkey and mozilla can't
coexist. They have different names, but even if they didn't, there
are slots for apache and apache2, as many different kernels as you
could possibly want, and ... mozilla and seamonkey conflict with each
other. Why?
--
... _._. ._ ._. . _._. ._. ___ .__ ._. . .__. ._ .. ._.
Felix Finch: scarecrow repairman & rocket surgeon / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG = E987 4493 C860 246C 3B1E 6477 7838 76E9 182E 8151 ITAR license #4933
I've found a solution to Fermat's Last Theorem but I see I've run out of room o
--
[email protected] mailing list
