On Friday 30 May 2008 22:10:00 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote: > oh really? > > I don't think so.
You also "think" that * it's Paludis's fault that the maintainers of some of the overlays I use chose to commit eclasses with the same names as those in the tree * package.mask syntax, that I explicitly stated was supported by Portage when I first mentioned it, is invalid Please forgive me if I don't find your li^W"opinions" very compelling. -- [email protected] mailing list
