2008/5/30 Hemmann, Volker Armin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, David Leverton wrote: > > On Friday 30 May 2008 21:16:06 Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: > > > On Freitag, 30. Mai 2008, Duncan wrote: > > > > I've not done paludis due to its lack of binary package support. > Even > > > > tho I'm running only a single computer > > > > > > there is another reason not to use paludis: > > > > > > you can't go back. > > > > > > At least not easily. > > > > That is a vicious, ridiculous lie (and the rest only gets worse). > > http://www.gentooexperimental.org/not-the-gwn/not-the-gwn-current.html > > for some numbers. > > typical paludis-supporter behaviour: > http://r0bertz.blogspot.com/2007/01/be-careful-when-you-are-on-paludis.html > > ciaranm, known to game the system. Abusive against users. > rbrown&spb, just removed because of their abusive behaviour. > > And think about that: why is there a whole bunch of paludis support threads > in > f.g.o? > > And why is there not one for pkgcore? (hint, because it is so easy to use) > -- > [email protected] mailing list > > as i've said before: it's not fair to judge the quality of the software by its producers. i don't agree on how they behave, but that doesn't imply that if they behave in that way their software is by default bad.
-- dott. ing. beso
