On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Paul Hartman
<[email protected]> wrote:
<SNIP>
>
> it is hwclock on my system. it belongs to sys-apps/openrc-0.4.2 which
> you may not be using.
>
Everyone's sort of quiet today...
So, reading back through this thread I'm wondering what the risk level
is in going to the newer baselayout stuff? If I keyword baselayout
~amd64 then it wants openrc. If I then keyword openrc ~amd64 it wants
me to emerge -C stuff that, should the power go off during the
process, might leave the system unbootable.
Is udev *really* going away?
- Mark
lightning ~ # emerge -pvDuN system
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild U ] sys-apps/baselayout-2.0.0 [1.12.11.1] USE="-build
(-bootstrap%) (-static%) (-unicode%*)" 23 kB
[ebuild N ] sys-apps/openrc-0.4.2 USE="ncurses pam unicode -debug" 142 kB
[blocks B ] <sys-fs/udev-133 ("<sys-fs/udev-133" is blocking
sys-apps/openrc-0.4.2)
[blocks B ] <sys-apps/sysvinit-2.86-r11
("<sys-apps/sysvinit-2.86-r11" is blocking sys-apps/openrc-0.4.2)
