On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Thanasis <[email protected]> wrote: > on 02/24/2009 10:03 PM Thanasis wrote the following: >> on 02/24/2009 09:57 PM Paul Hartman wrote the following: >>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Thanasis <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> on 02/24/2009 08:04 PM Martin Herrman wrote the following: >>>>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Thanasis <[email protected] >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> on 02/24/2009 07:52 PM Thanasis wrote the following: >>>>> > ...snip... >>>>> I know that the problem is related to mono, because with the "-mono" >>>>> flag it emerges successfully. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=255845 >>>> In Comment #7 and #9 it talks about a patch, but where can we find it?/ >>> buildfix-mono-2-2.diff which is already in your portage tree (if you >>> have synced this month). >>> >> Here is what I have: >> # updatedb && locate buildfix-mono-2-2.diff >> /usr/local/portage/layman/sunrise/app-office/openoffice-infra/files/3.0.1/gentoo-buildfix-mono-2-2.diff >> /usr/local/portage/layman/sunrise/app-office/openoffice-infra/files/3.0.1/.svn/text-base/gentoo-buildfix-mono-2-2.diff.svn-base >> /usr/portage/app-office/openoffice/files/buildfix-mono-2-2.diff >> >> ...but then why does it still fail ? > I mean, do I have to manually apply it?
No, it looks like it is being applied. I think it is simply not fixing your problem. Maybe there's some other bug happening.
