Frank Peters <[email protected]> skribis: > Barry Schwartz <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Depending on what the DOS fs stuff is for, sys-fs/ntfs3g might be a > > better option, anyway, though I have a vfat partition from before I > > discovered ntfs3g, and would keep dosfstools (and the kernel support) > > and/or mtools around anyway, for working with those very occasional > > floppies. > > > > It's not just floppies. FAT still has a major use for formatting > memory cards in digital cameras. If one is going to process digital > images with Linux one had better have the ability to handle FAT > partitions.
That makes sense. There's mtools as well, but it's nice to be able to mount the fs.
