On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 12:29 +0100, Åsmund Grammeltvedt wrote: > On Friday 16 March 2007 12:24, Andrew Gaffney wrote: > > Åsmund Grammeltvedt wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > > > Is portage_overlay supposed to do something useful for grp targets? The > > > combination of generic_stage_target.py:907, which forces PORTDIR_OVERLAY > > > to /usr/local/portage, and "portage_overlay" missing in > > > grp_target.py:112's action_sequence, means that the overlay won't be > > > where portage looks for it. Not having overlays available for the GRP > > > target seems somewhat impractical. > > > > So file a bug. > > I'm going to, but I wanted to sanity check first. That's what the question > mark's there for.
It should be available/usable, yes. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
