Ok, now i solved the package.unmask problem by adding
"portage_confdir:/etc/portage" to the stage1 spec file.

On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 02:37:30 +0200
Raboo Treed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Okay i unmasked it in /etc/portage/package.unmask
> But it still says that sys-apps/gli-0.5.4 is masked.
> When using catalyst, do i unmask the packages in another place?
> 
> On Sat, 9 Jun 2007 01:02:00 +0200
> Raboo Treed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Okay, next problem, gli is in my stage1 spec file.
> > - sys-apps/gli-0.5.4 (masked by: package.mask)
> > Should i remove it or should i unmask it? it says it can do serious
> > breakages on a machine, but this is in a chroot.. so i guess a
> > unmask is in order?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Fri, 08 Jun 2007 07:19:21 -0500
> > Andrew Gaffney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > > Raboo Treed wrote:
> > > > Hey, i got problems of which i don't know how to fix.
> > > > 
> > > > things that are wrong:
> > > > lockfile does not exist
> > > > '/var/tmp/catalyst/snapshot_cache/2007-r0/.catalyst_lock'
> > > > it does exist.
> > > 
> > > This isn't a problem.
> > > 
> > > > also of course the ovbious 
> > > > chroot: cannot run command `/tmp/livecd-stage1-chroot.sh': Exec
> > > > format error
> > > 
> > > This is.
> > > 
> > > > Cross-compiling on x86 for different machine type amd64
> > > 
> > > This is your problem. If you want to build for amd64, do it on
> > > amd64.
> > > 

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Reply via email to