On Thu, 2008-09-04 at 04:51 +0200, Peter Stuge wrote: > Andrew Gaffney wrote: > > >I think someone else should also have noticed this too. > > > > Yes, we've noticed. However, releng doesn't build stage4 tarballs, > > so we didn't care. > > I care. Is b.g.o the right way to go?
Yes. > > which we obviously don't support :) > > Sure. It was a somewhat desperate attempt. A workaround might be to > put a hacked glibc ebuild in my overlay, but I would like to avoid > that upkeep in the long run. Well, it needs to be fixed in the glibc ebuild, rather than catalyst. File a bug against glibc and feel free to add [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the CC list, so we can watch/track the bug, also. -- Chris Gianelloni Developer wolf31o2.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
