On Thursday 15 October 2009 12:48:50 Peter Stuge wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > > I'm having problems again with groupadd, > > > > > > Maybe it's a problem with eutils.eclass? If it's inherited then it's > > > fair to expect that all it's functions will work. How to solve this > > > for user database changes that want to call programs in shadow? > > > > there is no problem with eutils.eclass > > Because it is not intended to function for stage2? Or because it is > intended to assume that groupadd and friends are available?
the release building tools have to make shadow available earlier for Linux targets > But where is the problem? One idea is to provide another > implementation of these commands than the one in shadow. If that's > a good idea, then where should that implementation go? this is a bad idea -mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
