William Hubbs wrote: > Yes, it was added a couple of days ago, without giving a reasonable > amount of time for discussion.
You know just as well as I do that this thread is the most discussion that this mailing list has seen in a very long time. Sebastian wants to make some progress. I see no problem. > For a significant change like this, "significant" is so subjective though. > I think we should give 24-48 hours and make the patch visible > somewhere It is clear that you are displeased because you think you did not have a chance to oppose the change before it was made. I can understand, but in reality I doubt the one opposing voice would have made a difference. > Remember that we have people here in multiple time zones, This is a given for all project. Not sure why you think anyone needs to be reminded of this. > and we don't necessarily check these lists every day. I would set some kind of notification up, so that response does not depend on me checking something. > Based on this as well as my previous objections I would like to see > this change reverted. I disagree and hope that most others do as well, so that development will continue instead of being stuck on senseless arguing with you. What about my suggestion to fix the actual problem, asciidoc dependencies, did you bother looking into that yet? (I haven't because I don't feel at all strongly.) Thanks! //Peter
pgpr9Jh10w7BC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
