On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Sebastian Pipping <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Jorge, > > > On 06/25/2012 02:17 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: >>> it seems there is a tag >> >>> CATALYST-2.0.9 >> >>> in Git but no trace of an ebuild in Gentoo. If there is purpose >>> here, have you considered adding a masked ebuild, instead? >>> What is your motivation for the current approach? >> >> This isn't a "bug". I've tagged the release to test a few things >> related to the move from make.conf and make.profile from /etc to >> /etc/portage. I'll add the ebuild to the tree in a few days. > > It's been two weeks. Please add an ebuild for 2.0.9 to give > interested users of catalyst the chance to check it out. If you feel > it's too "hot" for mass consumption please mask it one way > (package.mask) or another (KEYWORDS=""). > > For the future I propose we really release releases (i.e. git tag, > tarball and and ebuild) or to make no release tag if if there is no > release.
I completely agree with all of this.
